By using this website you allow us to place cookies on your computer. Please read our Privacy Policy for more details.
Publication Date: December 2006
Publisher: Library of Congress. Congressional Research Service
Author(s):
Research Area: Environment; Law and ethics
Type:
Abstract:
Several environmental statutes contain national security exemptions, which the Department of Defense (DOD) can obtain on a case-by-case basis. Since FY2003, DOD has sought broader exemptions that it argues are needed to preserve training capabilities and ensure military readiness. There has been disagreement in Congress over the need for broader exemptions in the absence of data on the overall impact of environmental requirements on training and readiness. There also has been disagreement over the potential impacts of broader exemptions on environmental quality. After considerable debate, the 107th Congress enacted an exemption from the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and the 108th Congress enacted exemptions from the Marine Mammal Protection Act and certain parts of the Endangered Species Act. These exemptions were contentious to some because of concerns about the weakening of protections for animals and plants. As in recent years, DOD again requested exemptions from the Clean Air Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), as part of its FY2007 defense authorization proposal. Concerns within Congress about human health and environmental risks motivated opposition to these exemptions. In response, the 109th Congress did not include these exemptions in FY2007 defense authorization legislation (H.R. 5122) or FY2007 defense appropriations legislation (H.R. 5631 and H.R. 5385).